the company staff to call 120 for help
Security is not considered in the "working hours and jobs' death
Insurance Bureau Unit prosecutor requested the court to dismiss its lawsuit
Value End night died of a sudden illness was identified injuries
WASHINGTON (Reporter paid in) after the completion of the security value night died of a sudden illness,http://www.sxj7.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=9033&fromuid=761,hollister france, the Board determined who should be regarded as work-related injury insurance,hogan outlet,http://www.menqiu.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, but the company refused to accept the People's Insurance Bureau sued the court that was not "working hours and jobs."
Reporters today that the judgment of the Court dismissed the claims of the company, People's Insurance Bureau related injuries found no improper.
Wang Li (pseudonym) is a security company responsible for the night shift. November 30, 2009 in the morning,hollister france, after he finished the night with a colleague values go out to eat breakfast,http://www.colors-st.com/mobile/epad/epad.cgi?post=1&del=7378%3C/b%3E,hogan,http://dloret2i4j9r.hatenablog.com/entry/2014/07/19/150355, then back to the unit ready to go home when a sudden onset.
Day 9:30 or so, the company staff to call 120 for help, emergency vehicles to the scene half an hour later,http://www.starchadhesives.com/blog/?module=tyi9j4fgh6,herve leger sale, when Wang had died. The police to the scene after the inquest that Wang is a disease sudden death,http://www.linkclub.or.jp/~ayacon/tukuba/custombbs.cgi.del/www.iprobienetre.fr/giuseppezanotti/www.cdsrugby.fr/air-max-bw-classic/www.iprobienetre.fr/giuseppezanotti/www.forzieri.fr/acheter-louboutin/, not a criminal case.
After the incident,hogan outlet, Wang related injuries mother submitted an application to the People's Insurance Bureau, the Bureau survey found Wang's death should be regarded as work-related injuries. But the company refused to accept the rejection of this instrument, the People's Insurance Bureau to court.
Court rejected the company does not recognize its instruments,mulberry sale, called the People's Insurance Bureau did not directly served the way it served notice published through newspapers, resulting in the company June 21,armani pas cher, 2010 related injuries before that conclusion, the People's Insurance Bureau of practice " violation of procedure ", deprived of the right to plead the company's impact statements,polo ralph lauren, apply for withdrawal rights, the rights of the investigation and evidence collection rights.
The company also believes that Wang is temporary, irregular working hours, does not belong to the provisions of the Labor Contract Law and Labor Relations Adjustment object; him after work in the morning sudden illness of death, not "during working hours and jobs, sudden illness or death within 48 hours after she died, "does not meet the legal requirements for related injuries.
Court that the company is only temporary king force does not belong to the provisions of the Labor Contract Law and Labor Relations Adjustment object, but did not provide supporting evidence. People's Insurance Bureau conducted a work-related injury investigation indeed,scarpe hogan, during the company did not exist on the two sides of labor relations dispute. Therefore,hollister france, the People's Insurance Bureau under investigation transcripts and other materials, determined the existence of labor relations and corporate Wang, accordingly related injuries deemed inappropriate.
Wang believes the company is not in working hours and job sudden illness death,http://www.stones-garden.com/cgi-bin/o/s/a.cgi, and the reality is that Wang did not return home after the night shift finished value, because the company manager notification of all security units in the morning meeting,http://taji-hen-clb.sakura.ne.jp/cgi-bin/joyful.cgi?mode=, it is precisely in Wang Gang After the finish in the locker room unit, is preparing to go home when changing the incidence of death.
The company's proposed procedural law issues,karen millen, both from the fact still see from a legal perspective, is not true.
